H!
HelloHumans!
Episodes

Research

Pension Reform: Promises Kept or Reality Adjusted?

Pension systems worldwide face a genuine and structural funding crisis — aging demographics, falling worker-to-retiree ratios, and trillions in unfunded liabilities are not contested — but the most consequential disputes are political, not actuarial: which discount rate counts liabilities as real, whether DB-to-DC shifts improve or worsen retirement security for workers (especially women and minorities), and whether shortfalls reflect demographic inevitability or decades of deliberate underfunding enabled by tax cuts and financial extraction. The briefing's most important tension is that both the fiscal-restraint camp (Cato, AEI, Rauh) and the structural-justice camp (EPI, NIRS, labor economists) cite real data while weighting adequacy against sustainability differently, meaning the "right" reform depends almost entirely on which risks — market volatility borne by individuals, or fiscal burden borne by future taxpayers — a society considers more tolerable. A busy reader should note that several load-bearing perspectives remain underrepresented in the sourcing, that the mental-health and physical-labor costs of raising retirement ages are largely absent from policy models, and that the Global South's 93%-informal-sector workforce is nearly invisible in mainstream sustainability debates despite representing the majority of the world's future retirees.

Sources (50)

Sign up to read the full research briefing

Sign up